New Sustaining Member – HCL Clamping Solutions

New Sustaining Member – HCL Clamping Solutions

HCL is a UK based family owned business providing cost effective, non-metallic and innovative solutions for Subsea, Cathodic Protection and Anti-Corrosion industries. HCL is the World Leader in high strength non-metallic polymer banding technologies for the Oil & Gas and associated industries and manufactures the Strongest Polymer Cable Tie in the World. Specialising in the long term, secure clamping of Subsea applications such as Risers, VIV Strakes, Pipeline Piggy Back and Cold Applied Tape Wrap Jacketed Corrosion Protection Systems. Latest additions to the HCL range include the ability to mount Sacrificial Anodes without welding or metal hoop clamps with a range of Smart Bands that facilitate reduced site visits and lowering Diver costs with less time required for fitting. Complemented with HCL’s ability to secure ICCP anodes and reference electrodes HCL can provide the complete package for non-ferrous mounting of corrosion protection of marine assets.

David Deacon – 1936 – 2017

David Deacon – 1936 – 2017

24 October 1936 – 31 March 2017

It is with great sadness that we announce the death of David Deacon on 31st March 2017. David was a stalwart of the Institute, supporting it virtually all of his long working life. In recognition of his service, he was elected an Honorary Life Fellow in 1992, and as a mark of David’s continued significant and influential contributions to the Institute, he received the Lifetime Achievement Award, a unique decoration especially created for him (a report by John O’Shea on this is given in Corrosion Management no 87, January 2009).      In 1976 he became the Technical Committee Chairman and Council member and was Chairman of Council from 1986-1988. He took on a part-time role as Honorary Secretary, became Vice-President (twice) and was President from 2002-2004. He also contributed to the work of London Branch between 2013-2015.

A more personal view of David’s life and contributions to the Institute is given below

People always wanted to know what the ‘H’ stood for.  He always used the initial.  But he never gave the name.  So I asked him.  ‘Humfrey’ he said (I didn’t learn about the spelling until much later).  Turned out it was a family name, and way back one of the early holders had left a bequest to any of the male descendants who had it in their name.  So David always kept it and always acknowledged it – and Wil (David’s son) has got it too – but it’s not spelled like a ‘regular’ Humphrey.  There was always something unexpected about David.

For example, he’d been a Public Schoolboy – not many people knew that.  And his Latin master christened him Praelatus(?) – because he was a ‘Deacon’ and therefore must be a prelate of some description.  Evidently this chap had a Latin nickname for everyone in the school.  DHD had been a good sportsman in his day – Played cricket for the County (Hampshire? Berkshire?  I’m not sure) but was a very useful footballer too.  And a life-long (not to say rabid) Reading supporter.

I first met him in about 1981.  In court.  I was supporting David Scantlebury on a seawater outfall (i.e. sewage) pipe job for Welsh Water.  David was out for the contractor.  We said the ultra high-build factory-applied coating was porous.  David said it wasn’t.  David won.  He wasn’t right, but that didn’t matter.  We looked like wet-behind-the-ears academics when it came to the court skirmish.  We knew well that impedance tests had shown without doubt that the coating absorbed water and was porous.  It shouldn’t have been accepted.  Deacon said it was a perfectly good coating and there was nothing wrong with it.  The judge believed him.  I was hopping mad.  I resolved never to let that happen to me again.

The next time I came across him it would be around 1986.  I was going to the NACE Conference in Houston.  NACE had developed a Coating Inspection Training and Certification Scheme and the UK Institute of Corrosion was interested in partnering to offer it in Europe.  David Gearey (CAPCIS/UMIST) was my Director and he asked me to meet up with Deacon and help with the pitch to NACE.  “He can kick on a bit”, said Gearey “But he may have calmed down these days”.  I felt I’d just bitten into a sour plum.

Actually, Deacon was charming – and we were successful in convincing NACE to work with the Institute, which was excellent.  He and C. Jay Steele, who was really the person behind the NACE CIT&CC, got on really well and that was the key.  Deacon’s company, ITI, was also going hammer and tongs in Houston at the time – as well as in Singapore and across the Middle East, and in the UK he and Jackie (Deacon) were tremendous supporters of ICorr and the NACE/ICorr Joint Venture collaboration.

ITI had been grown out of a ‘moonlight flit’ from BIE (British Inspection Engineers).  David had been heading up the Coatings Inspection activities, became frustrated with the management inertia and decided it was time to set up his own company.  Jackie was his secretary and bailed out with him.  I heard that BIE weren’t happy about it, but that was just too bad – Deacon was already away and pushing hard.

He’d started out at British Aluminium, and evidently prior to that he’d been employed as a young trainee in some kind of asbestos company.  He told me recently of the trainees “throwing ‘snowballs’ (of asbestos fibres) at each other, and wiping the asbestos dust out of their mugs at tea break.  I never did properly understand the background but he never went to University and didn’t have a degree, but he’d obtained  a Diploma in Paint Technology and Polymer Chemistry.  In certain respects, he was responsible for transforming the ‘high performance coatings and linings’ industry in the UK.  He was very clear that there was all the difference in the world between ‘decorative paint’ and ‘high performance protective coatings and linings’.  He accumulated a collection of world-class specialists and experts – Harry Bray, Gil Hill, Derek Bayliss, and between them they DEFINED what it takes to ensure good-quality surface preparation and proper application of a high-performance anti-corrosion coating.  The book he wrote with Derek Bayliss (Steelwork Corrosion Control, Spon Press) is still the benchmark reference text for coating technology.

I was never clear why he was prepared to work so hard for the Institute of Corrosion.  During the heyday of North Sea Oil development in the 70’s and 80’s he put huge effort into the Annual UK Corrosion Conference, which was the single most profitable activity that the Institute had at the time.  Even when the ICorr was virtually bankrupted as a result of over-ambitious expenditure and poor management, Deacon was the one person who was still prepared to go and fight for it.  Only Deacon had the confidence and commitment to oppose the claim of a former administrator for ‘unfair dismissal’.  He won that case (for the Institute) too – but on that occasion he was absolutely correct.

He gave the Institute of Corrosion a home at the ITI office, initially rent free when there was no money in the ICorr bank account and under-wrote many of its activities until it could stand on its own financial feet once again and had Gillian (Inwood), his long-serving and faithful Secretary, field ICorr activities while employed by his own company.  Four years later, there was £200,000 in the reserves and the Institute has continued to prosper since that time.  Subsequently, he worked with John O’Shea to enable the Institute to purchase its own premises – Corrosion House – though actually the mortgage could only be funded because SPC took the rest of the building.  In the face of massive opposition, he first proposed the ICorr Corporate Sustaining Membership scheme – now responsible for generating around one-third of the ICorr annual income, and he instigated Correx – the commercial arm of ICorr, now responsible for the ICATS scheme a substantial proportion of ICorr training revenue.

I’ve really only worked closely with David on consultancy activities over the past ten years or so.  Something came up in Saudi Arabia and I asked if he’d like to collaborate – he on the coatings aspects and I on the metallic corrosion issues.  We were out in a storage area for new cars with a couple of guys form the British Geological Survey – right on the edge of the coast – and the sun was beating down.  Being outside in an open area, we didn’t need hard hats, and being close to the sea there was a constant cooling breeze all day.  It was only in the evening that we realised how much we’d caught the sun – especially David as his hair was thinning more than mine.  The following day wasn’t much fun at all, though for one reason or another we just laughed all the time.

That set the style for our continuing to work together on an ad-hoc basis.  He would ALWAYS drive, I’d look after the metallic corrosion and he’d deal with the coatings issues.  It was just so much FUN!  He could be extraordinarily compassionate and nursed his wife Hilary when she developed pancreatic cancer.  It took a lot out of him, but the work – and the cats – were welcome diversions.  There were so many contrasts – on the one hand he could be ruthlessly hard-nosed and, on the other, he could be ridiculously generous.  He cared for his clients and his staff, though when he sold ITI he was less interested in the inspection side and concentrated more on consultancy activities while Wil took primary responsibility for the inspections business.

After the embargo was lifted he was happy to look at a job in Tripoli – partly to support a client and partly to try and give a little encouragement to the then fledgling Libyan democracy movement.  He went to Jordan to look at a pipeline because he was sure that his client had been given poor advice from a contractor and he wanted to make sure the issue was resolved.  Even when clearly starting to lose his health, he was prepared to take on a job in Abu Dhabi for the same client, just because he wanted to continue to support them, even though now he was in his late 70’s.  Always in demand, he would drive through the night, or work through the night, looking at bridges for the Highways Agency (now Highways England).  Old as he was, he was still the top coating consultant in the UK, and possibly world-wide, and the people who knew him were happy if he was prepared to take on their work.

The last trip I went on with him was to Ireland – Dublin.  The visit and meeting went well enough, but we were finished early and there would be a four-hour wait for the flight.  He wasn’t interested in hanging about at the airport.  We took a flight back to Heathrow (or original reservation was for Luton), just to get back earlier on a Friday evening, even though we then needed a taxi to travel from Heathrow to Luton to collect our car.  I couldn’t believe how keen he was to get home.  He’d had enough.  He never went on site again.

David turned 80 in October last.  There was a party – just a small affair – family and a few old friends.  He didn’t stay for the whole event but he was in good form and gave a nice little speech.  He was still contributing to projects even up to January of this year – he wouldn’t go to site but he was pleased to talk through what was happening and even weak as he was he would still make a comment or suggestion that was pithy and pertinent – still saving his clients’ money.  Deacon was part of the team that specified the coating for the Thames Barrier – now coming up to 40 years in service from a single-layer hot-applied system.  Other ‘experts’ had said it was impossible.  Deacon proved them wrong.  Deacon was the person who ended the joke of ‘Painting the Forth (Rail) Bridge’.  When he’d finished it wouldn’t need painting again for at least another 25 years.  As we drove around the motorway network he would point out different projects he was responsible for – the Mersey Tunnel; the Dartford Crossing; Tower Bridge (London); the Tamar Bridge; the galvanized bridge on the A1 just South of Newcastle, a footbridge here, an equipment tower there, the Cutty Sark, oil storage tanks in the UK, Ireland and elsewhere around the world.  He’d worked on railway viaducts in India, Nepal, Kuwait, and given coating training courses in every major industrialised country in the world – a massive infrastructure legacy that is more reliable and less expensive to operate after David Deacon had applied his expertise.

I needed a chat with Wil on the 22nd February about the Millau Viaduct and we arranged to meet at the house in Eggington – roughly mid-way between Wil’s house and mine.  I knew David was getting closer to the end, he’d said goodbye at my previous visit, but when Wil and I had finished work for the day David said he’d like me to pop upstairs for five minutes.  We got through the pleasantries and then attention turned to the meeting.  As ever, he had two, maybe three comments that were directly relevant to the project.  He hung on until the end of March.  He’d been diagnosed the same day as Terry Wogan (in November 2015), he said, and he’d lived a full twelve months longer than Wogan.  Not bad for a guy who was given 4-6 weeks and completely typical of a person who would just never give in.

It’s not very long since Jack Tighe passed away.  David wanted to go to the funeral and I went along with him.  The joke that day amongst the corrosion industry cognoscenti was that St. Peter needed the gates painted and Jack Tighe had obviously got the contract.  It would appear that ‘Senior Management’ had decided to call Deacon in to do the independent inspection and ensure the work was done properly.

I’ve missed working with him this past few weeks/months and I know I’m going to continue to miss him, but I won’t forget the work we did together or the fun we had while doing it.  Life was always interesting with David Deacon – you never quite knew what was going to happen next, but it was always worthwhile and it was always special.  You KNEW he’d probably seen it a dozen times before and you could be confident that any recommendation he gave would be sound and reliable.  As with all individuals who are completely fluent in their subject area, he would tell you anything you wanted to know, and he would still know twice/three times what you knew about it when he’d told you anything he thought might be relevant.  The Institute of Corrosion has lost a dedicated servant and supporter, his clients have lost a friend and a mainstay, and I have lost a close friend and colleague.  There aren’t many in the world who command the kind of respect that David H. Deacon enjoyed.  He really was quite a boy.  RIP 31/03/2017.

North East Branch – April News

North East Branch – April News

The second branch meeting of the year was held on 27 April at the Rosen UK facility in Gosforth.  The well attended meeting included David David Mobbs (chairman London branch) and the President of Institute of Corrosion, Sarah Vasey. 

Malcolm Morris, Technical Support Manager Sherwin Williams, presented an in depth technical review of ISO standards and detailed the process that is undertaken in various levels of standards’ committees – local, national and international. ISO committees can be split down into, Technical committees – TC’s, Sub committees – SC’s and Working Groups – WG’s.  However there are also other groups which can influence the development of standards namely, IPPIC – International Paint & Printing Ink committee and CEPE – European Confederation of Paint and Ink Manufacturers.   In particular, Malcolm updated the audience on the current changes to the ISO 12944-6 standard with regard to updating the performance requirements for the various environments.

Many members of the audience were unaware that there were so many steps to go through to get modifications made to standards, and the description of the current process was very informative. There were numerous questions from the audience relating to the correlation of anticorrosive testing in the laboratory with actual field data. There were definite concerns that there was indeed no correlation and therefore how could the data be relied upon. It became very evident that the key to understanding the performance of coating was still looking at ‘track record’ of coatings in a particular environment. The comments from the meeting really showed what an emotive topic this is, and how much it matters to get these standards right.

London Branch March News

London Branch March News

March was the Branch’s AGM, and reports were given by the outgoing chairman, Jim Gynn and the hon treasurer, Mike Allen.  The branch had completed a full and successful meetings programme at their new venue, Imperial College, where they have started to see an increase in attendance with the average up from 30 to 50. The accounts showed a healthy surplus, and funds would be returned to the headquarters account. David Mobbs was elected as the new chairman with George Winning as vice-chair.  Jim also thanked, John O’Shea, Mike Allen, Geoff White, Mash Biaglioli and David Dore, who have all stepped down from the committee, after giving long service to the branch.

After the AGM, Sarah Vasey, the President, gave a presentation about the Institute and its work, which included presentations on an up-date to Corrosion Management, Young ICorr and its aims, and the Route to Chartered Status.

Sarah started with a description of the Institute and how it is made up, including Council, Branches and Divisions, then described the awards, the Quality System, and website. The section on the Council introduced the trustees of the Institute and how they are linked to the larger Council. The members of Council and their roles were then discussed.  The work of the Council involves driving a number of initiatives in which the various Branches have been heavily involved in.  CED was then introduced and the role it plays within the Institute discussed, including a promotion of the upcoming CED day.  It is perhaps not well known that the Institute gives out various awards and the requirements to be a recipient of these were described. Sarah discussed the implementation of the ISO 9001 quality system at Head Office and finally she mentioned the update to the website that is taking place to make it more useful to members.

The editor gave a brief up-date on the new format of Corrosion Management which had been redesign to make it easier to read, and also to include more technical articles and news relevant to the members.   Chris Bridge described the young ICorr initiative, which continues the work started with the Young Engineer program, to promote the Institute to a younger generation. The section is aimed at the 35 and under age group, but not exclusively, and as part of the process there will be events for this group to attend and hopefully branch events can be aimed at the Young ICorr members in the future.  The final subject of the evening was presented by Don Harrop on “The Route to Chartered Status” via the Institute of Corrosion. We are trying to encourage Engineers to get their Chartership through the Institute, and to achieve this, a mentoring program is currently being established with experienced professionals leading them through the process so they can understand the requirements needed to achieve Chartered Status. The program is aimed to go live in September 2017, so potential candidates should put their name forward to,

The evening finished with a lively question and answer session and then the usual London networking session.

The new Branch chair, David Mobbs, welcomes Jim Britton as speaker.

The April meeting featured a presentation by Jim Britton, President and CEO of Deepwater Corrosion Services, on “Some Recent Offshore Cathodic Protection Life Extension Projects – So What’s New”.

Jim has worked in the Offshore Corrosion business since 1973, and for the last 17 years focussed on Asset Integrity and in particular Life Extension.

He described six current offshore projects which were challenging from a technical, and of course a financial perspective with owner operators who are reluctant to spend money on assets that are getting towards the end of their life. These included using using a novel series of anode belts, and utilising a novel clamp arrangement, which did not require welding, and which could be installed using an ROV, to attach new anodes to a concrete weighted pipe associated with platforms in Malaysia, where diver intervention would also be cost prohibitive.

A fully retractable suspended ICCP anode system was designed for a very old FSO in the Irish Sea, which would not be affected by inclement weather, and the largest ICCP retrofit to a single structure in the North Sea, and the first use of a containerised power supply system because of the lack of deck space. Interestingly there were members in the room who were involved in the original design which was to provide corrosion protection for 25 years, and it actually lasted 40 years.

There were a number of takeaways from this excellent presentation, but one of the major points was that whilst there are Codes of Practice for new build, there are no codes for retro- fit projects.

Aberdeen Branch – March News

Aberdeen Branch – March News

The third meeting of 2017 was held on Tuesday the 28th March, with 28 attendees representing major companies including Atkins, BP, CNR, DNV GL, Lloyds Register, Oceaneering, Subsea 7, TOTAL and Wood Group. 

The event was an industrial visit to the premises of Cosasco Europe HQ in Aberdeen, to hear about the latest Advances in Probe and Coupon Monitoring and Safe Access / Retrieval of Data, with many live demonstrations being performed.

Derek Morton explains the concept of under insulation monitoring

Specialist equipment for solids erosion tracking and production well management was also illustrated.  Solids determination to minimise erosion and determine the solids-free flow rate is considered essential practice for maximising equipment life. A lively debate followed the speaker presentation with many questions from the audience. 

There were opportunities later to inspect at close hand, a wide range of advanced electronic sampling tools and data reporting systems, with Cosasco consultants and Engineers including, Andy Allan, Mark Maulvaney, Richard Rae, James Taylor, Sandy Tweddle and Dean Smith (Aberdeen Base Manager), all on hand to explain how such devices can be optimised to best advantage.

The activities that followed the technical presentation included informative demonstrations of pressurised retrieval operations of data logging devices, wireless monitoring technologies, probe and chemical monitoring applications and safety isolation devices. There were also a number of poster displays and the wide range of models and test rigs certainly kept the attention of the branch members throughout the evening. Advanced monitoring probes were displayed, including those intended specifically for laboratory use such LPR devices. The differing sensitivity and speed of available probes was clearly demonstrated, along with their most commonly used applications, e.g. Galvanic for water injection service and their relationship to other types of process instrumentation and to chemical injection monitoring was also explained.

The associated retrieval devices (which are either mechanical or hydraulic based tools) can work across a range of pressures up to 6000 psi with telescopic and non-elescopic options. Lower cost intrusive monitoring options, such the use of test coupons were also highlighted.

This event created a tremendous amount of interest from attendees, with an extended networking session following the event and some splendid catering provided by Cosasco staff which was very well received by all.  It proved to be an excellent event in every respect.

James Taylor demonstrates the High pressure mechanical retrieval tool.

The April meeting, held on Tuesday 25th, had 40 attendees from local companies, and considered advances in Cathodic Protection, looking at Simulation Techniques to help assess CP Current Output of Buried Subsea Pipeline Anodes from Field Gradient Measurements, with a most interesting presentation by Tim Froome of Beasy.   The branch evening event followed the annual Aberdeen meeting of the Marine Corrosion Forum, enthusiastically chaired by Phil Dent.

Beasy based in Southampton, serve a wide industry base and focus specifically on how CP field distribution modelling can help better inform our understanding of (often very complex) cathodic protection behaviour and to help engineers assess mitigations and improve the CP design to be implemented.   The application of their specialist software was very effectively demonstrated throughout the evening, showing the use of advanced 3D Graphics to illustrate CP current flows under a range of different conditions such as buried CP current sources (sacrificial anodes), local current activity occurring around pipeline coating defects, long range current flows, vertical current distributions and demonstrations of shielding effects / possible CP under-protection at some sites. The paper very usefully complemented an earlier one given by Tim on CP effects at Crevices and Voids at the afternoons MCF Event.

Tim showed how the modelling software can assist in both determining the overall CP system performance and ensuring adequate protective current distribution, as well as assisting in determining the overall CP system life and the likely relative consumption of CP system anodes.

Many questions from the audience were forthcoming including the future integration of the CP Models with established surveys methods used by major subsea survey contractors, so as to make the best use of gathered CP data and to optimize reporting for the CP Systems owners.

Modelling of CP current flowlines is clearly explained by the speaker.

The CP Flowline phenomenon aroused great interest amongst gathered delegates and the speaker explained that Beasy are intending to develop these relationships forward in the future, so as to assist the subsea industry and the extensive Marine CP markets.

For information about the Aberdeen branch activities please contact our branch secretary, Frances Chalmers,, alternatively a calendar of local events of interest to corrosion professionals in the Aberdeen area and the opportunity to sign up to the branch mailing list is available at

Aberdeen Branch have also established their new Media Centre, which can be found at




The 2017 CEOCOR Congress in Luxembourg was a great success, both technically and socially. The venue was excellent, and the superb Congress dinner was held on the Princess Marie-Astrid boat on the Moselle river, famous for the signing ceremony of the EU Schengen agreement! Thanks must go to our friends in Luxembourg.

Planning for the 2018 CEOCOR Congress in Stratford-upon-Avon, is well underway.  In addition to the technical presentations and exhibition, there will be a Partner’s Programme, including visits to Shakespeare’s birthplace, Anne Hathaway’s Cottage, behind the scenes at the Royal Shakespeare Theatre, and to a nearby stately home.

A sponsorship programme has been developed which offers a significant opportunity for the UK (and elsewhere) buried pipeline community to participate. The principal
or Platinum Sponsorship has already been taken up by National Grid, the sole owner and operator of the high pressure gas transmission infrastructure in the UK. Cathodic Protection Co. Ltd. from Grantham has taken one of the Gold Sponsorships, and will also sponsor the BBQ and Jazz evening. Other sponsorship packages are also available and details of these can be found on the conference website,  Those companies wishing to secure sponsorship at the 2018 CEOCOR Congress need to be quick, as places are filling-up fast.

Conference programme, registration details, hotel package, partner’s programme and news will all be available on the website, which will be regularly updated.