Big Bang STEM event at Parliament

Big Bang STEM event at Parliament

Anthony Setiadi, Vice President, represented ICorr at the Big Bang event at the Houses of Parliament. This was a fantastic event and great to see so many young students enthusiastic about science and engineering. The event was held at the Terrace Pavilion and organised by Engineering UK and hosted by Toby Perkins MP.  There were a number of speeches including from Toby Perkins MP,  Dame Chi Onwurah, who is a Chartered Engineer, and Dr Hilary Leevers, CEO of Engineering UK. However, the most impactful speech was from one of the winners of the Big Bang Event 2025 (Grace Palmer) who provided the background to her engineering solution to support her disabled cousin.  She  set out the problem, proposed a solution including coming up with a bill of materials needed, drawings and manufacture as well as trials and feedback with her ‘client’. Her passionate speech regarding Engineering with Empathy, really resonated with a lot of people in the room that were here to support and help others by their work in engineering.

There were numerous projects described from these students, covering inventions and research on mental health, fire safety, simplified transfer aid for disabled, adjustable walking stick for the blind, waste management solutions, and AI cancer detection amongst others. Another one that caught my eye was the research on CO2 emissions from the food we eat, which I think should be something  we as engineering practitioners should be using as one of our Safety / Sustainability moments.

Speaking to the young students was very inspiring for me including the way they articulated their work and how they set up their stall with posters and demonstration units. We should further support and encourage them to remain involved and be an ambassador in their community to highlight the rewarding work and career options available. Here at ICorr, we are involved with our Young ICorr initiatives and the YEP (Young Engineering Professionals) programme, but further engagement with colleges and schools will be another key focus, especially since a career in corrosion encompasses both traditional education and non-traditional routes.

 

 

Technical Article – A Framework for Evaluation of Ultrasonic Corrosion Inspection and Monitoring Strategies for  Large Steel Structures Yifeng Zhang, PhD, and Frederic Cegla, PhD

Technical Article – A Framework for Evaluation of Ultrasonic Corrosion Inspection and Monitoring Strategies for Large Steel Structures Yifeng Zhang, PhD, and Frederic Cegla, PhD

MEET THE AUTHORS

Dr Yifeng Zhang is a Postdoctoral Research Associate in the Non-Destructive Evaluation (NDE) Group at Imperial College London. His work focuses on ultrasonic Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) and inspection technologies that enhance structural integrity and operational efficiency across the energy and petrochemical sectors.

Dr Frederic Cegla is a Reader/Associate Professor in the non-destructive evaluation (NDE) Group at Imperial College London. His research focuses on developing and applying advanced technologies for non-destructive evaluation NDE, SHM, and process monitoring — linking cutting-edge sensing and wave physics with practical solutions for industry.

Introduction: The Challenge of Corrosion Surveillance

Corrosion remains one of the most persistent challenges in managing industrial assets such as power plants, processing facilities, pipelines, and ships. Unlike sudden failures, it develops gradually, often across vast areas and over decades of service.

The result is a degradation process that is both spatially and temporally diverse. Non-destructive evaluation (NDE) techniques such as ultrasonic testing and thickness gauging are widely used to provide critical information that underpins the safety, reliability, and availability of various assets. In practice, it is rarely feasible to perform complete (100%) inspection coverage of large downstream or marine facilities. Instead, inspection areas are typically prioritised using risk-based assessment (RBA) programmes, which focus resources on regions with the highest likelihood or consequence of corrosion Because of these practical constraints, current ultrasonic methods have evolved along two main directions.

Figure 1: Ultrasonic Thickness Measurement Techniques, Trade-Offs Between Spatial Coverage and Temporal Resolution.

Scheduled one-off inspections — often combined with visual assessments and performed using scanning systems — can cover large areas but occur infrequently due to the need for plant shutdowns or limited access [1–2]. In contrast, permanently installed automated monitoring sensors offer improved measurement repeatability and high temporal resolution but are typically deployed only at a few selected locations [3–4] owing to cost and installation complexity.

Towards Hybrid Inspection and Monitoring

Recent advances in robotics and sensor technologies are creating powerful synergies that blur the line between traditional one-off inspection and continuous monitoring. It is envisaged that autonomous robotic platforms will in future manipulate ultrasonic probes across complex geometries, while monitoring sensors will be deployed in hard-to-reach areas that once required significant manual effort.

Prototypes of resident inspection robots — designed to remain on the asset and operate semi-independently — are moving from research labs towards field demonstrations [5-6].

Figure 2: Integration of EMAT With Robotic Platforms (Image Courtesy of The Offshore Robotics for The Certification of Assets (ORCA) Hub, From Research That Led To The Formation of Sonobotics Ltd).

These developments point towards a hybrid surveillance model that combines the strengths of both worlds as part of the agreed inspection programme. For example, resident robots could perform encoded ultrasonic scans across a structure, leaving behind monitoring sensors in critical regions for long-term trending. There, instead of choosing between wide but infrequent inspections and highly localised monitoring, a mixed approach could provide a more complete picture of corrosion progression in both time and space. The opportunities are clear, but so are the challenges. How many robots or sensors are needed to ensure sufficient reliability and compliance with the agreed overall inspection programme? How does the hybrid scheme align with existing approaches? What are the cost implications and likely return on investment? These questions must be addressed before hybrid inspection-monitoring schemes can achieve widespread adoption.

While current best practices for NDT in the energy sector follow established standards such as API 581 and guidance provided
by organisations such as ESR-HOIS, a forward-looking study funded by the UK Research Centre in NDE (RCNDE) explored new methodologies to systematically evaluate and optimise hybrid inspection–monitoring strategies. [7–8]. This article highlights the main findings of the study, introducing a generic framework applicable across diverse industries and corrosion scenarios.

A Framework for Evaluating Hybrid Inspection–Monitoring Schemes

The proposed framework comprises four essential steps, each of which plays a role in simulating how corrosion evolves, how it is measured, and how the acquired data are interpreted.

1.Corrosion Modelling: Capturing the Degradation Process

The framework begins by establishing a model that accurately captures corrosion damage progression. Corrosion manifests differently across industries—from uniform wall thinning in pipelines to localised pitting in offshore structures and complex mixed morphologies in chemical processing facilities. It is recognised that no single model would suffice for all applications, and different scenarios demand models of varying complexity and fidelity.

While corrosion mechanisms vary widely, ultrasonic NDE measurements share a common dependency: the corroded surface profile. Since wave reflection from the corroding surface dictates the characteristics of measured ultrasonic signals, a suitable corrosion model must capture both the relevant surface morphology and its temporal evolution.

This approach decouples electrochemical complexities from NDE simulation requirements, enabling the corrosion model to be readily updated or substituted for different scenarios.

2. Modelling the NDE Technique

The second stage involves accurately representing the NDE method itself. Like all measurement systems, NDE techniques inherently contain errors and uncertainties. For instance, as part of theHOIS Joint Industry Project [9-10], the measurement error and uncertainties of several manual and automated corrosion mapping methods were evaluated, and the findings were found to vary significantly depending on the choice of equipment.

For normal-incidence ultrasonic thickness measurements, the signal depends on multiple factors: transducer characteristics (e.g. size, shape, operating frequency) and surface conditions (e.g. roughness) [11-12]. Signal processing algorithms further influence measurement outputs, with algorithm selection typically based on the expected defect type. Understanding and quantifying these error sources is crucial, as they propagate through to all subsequent analyses and decision-making processes.

While finite-element simulations can accurately capture wave propagation phenomena, their computational demands make statistical analysis of stochastic corrosion processes challenging. Surrogate models — either physics-based or data-driven—offer a practical alternative by balancing computational efficiency with accuracy. These simplified models enable systematic evaluation of NDE techniques while maintaining sufficient fidelity to represent real-world performance.

In practice, multiple models may be required to represent different equipment types, and these can later be integrated and refined as field experience accumulates. Ultimately, the chosen NDE model must reflect the technique’s inherent limitations and uncertainties as encountered in field applications.

xFigure 3: An Overview Of The Proposed Evaluation Framework.

Figure 4: Illustration Of The Ultrasonic Scanning Measurement: Comparison Between The True Underlying Surface And The Thickness Measurement Map Predicted By A Surrogate Model.

 3. Simulation of Data Acquisition Processes

The third stage models the data acquisition process, addressing real-world constraints such as operational access, spatial scanning resolution, limited probe availability, and restricted temporal measurement frequency. By focusing on data subsampling in time and space, the framework accounts for the incomplete nature of field measurements caused by sparse grids, irregular intervals, and missed data points. These constraints ensure a realistic representation of field deployment scenarios, enabling accurate assessments under practical conditions.

4.Defining Metrics of Reliability and Risk

Once simulated data are available, the next step is to establish performance assessment criteria. This involves defining a clear corrosion assessment objective, such as detecting defects above
a specified threshold or tracking the location and extent of the minimum remaining thickness. Ideally this data collection should be combined and reported along with prevailing operating parameters / modes e.g. cyclic operation to provide added value.

Quantitative metrics, such as the probability of detection (POD) or receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, are then applied. These metrics are evaluated on an ensemble of representative surfaces using Monte Carlo-style simulations to assess the effectiveness of various NDE data acquisition techniques and procedures. A proof-of-concept demonstration is detailed in Reference [7], where the objective was set to tracking the minimum remaining thickness within a defined tolerance. The study introduces a metric called the unreliability function (URF) to quantify the reliability of inspection and monitoring schemes. Using an ensemble of realisations that mimic field measurement characteristics, the study evaluates the reliability of three strategies: surface scanning, monitoring with permanently installed sensors, and a hybrid approach combining surface scanning with movable monitoring sensors. For the given scenario, the findings reveal that partial surface scanning followed by sensor repositioning/optimisation creates a hybrid strategy that substantially improves performance despite reduced operational demands: fewer sensors per location, limited coverage, and longer inspection cycles.

Conclusion and Outlook

Although manual inspection will continue to play an essential role in ensuring the structural integrity of critical infrastructure, advances in automation and robotics now make it feasible for an increasing proportion of inspection and monitoring activities to be performed automatically. In practice, adopting a hybrid inspection–monitoring strategy provides a promising means of optimising data collection and enhancing overall asset integrity.

The framework presented here outlines a structured approach
for evaluating hybrid inspection-monitoring schemes that
leverage recent advances in robotics, sensing, and modelling.
By clearly defining the interfaces between corrosion modelling, data acquisition, and performance evaluation, it supports the development of more flexible surveillance methods for industrial assets. Successful implementation requires coordinated efforts among corrosion engineers/scientists, NDE engineers, asset owners, and regulators. Key priorities include adapting models to specific industrial settings, validating performance through field studies, and developing accessible tools for practitioners. This progression from theoretical framework to practical implementation will enhance operational safety, asset availability, and economic efficiency.

References

1. J. Turcotte et al., “Comparison corrosion mapping solutions using phased array, conventional UT and 3D scanners,” 19th World Conference on Non-Destructive Testing (WCNDT 2016), 13-17 June 2016 in Munich, Germany. e-Journal of Nondestructive Testing Vol. 21(7). https://www.ndt.net/?id=19236.

2. V. P. Nikhil et al., “Flaw detection and monitoring over corroded surface through ultrasonic c-scan imaging,” Engineering Research Express, vol. 2 no.1, pp. 015010, jan 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ab618d.

3. F. B. Cegla et al., “High-temperature (>500°c) wall thickness monitoring using dry coupled ultrasonic waveguide transducers,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 156–167, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2011.1782.

4. C. H. Zhong et al., “Investigation of Inductively Coupled Ultrasonic Transducer System for NDE”. IEEE Transactions
on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol.
60, no. 6, pp. 1115–1125, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2674.

5. V. Ivan et al., “Autonomous non-destructive remote robotic inspection of offshore assets,” In Proc. OTC Offshore Technology Conference, May 2020, pp. D011S006R003. https://doi.
org/10.4043/30754-MS.

6. M. D. Silva et al., “Using External Automated Ultrasonic Inspection (C-Scan) for Mapping Internal Corrosion on Offshore Caissons,” In Proc. Offshore Technology Conference Brasil, 2023, pp. D031S033R001. https://doi.org/10.4043/32907-MS.

7. Y. Zhang and F. Cegla, “Quantitative evaluation of the reliability of hybrid corrosion inspection and monitoring approaches,” NDT & E Int., 2025, pp. 103527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ndteint.2025.103527.

8. Y. Zhang and F. Cegla, “Mon ami – monitoring and inspection strategy assessment investigation tool”. Accessed: July 18, 2025. https://www.pogo.software/monami/index.html.

9. S. F. Burch, “Precision thickness measurements for corrosion monitoring: initial recommendations and trial results”, HOIS, vol. 11, R3, no. 1, 2011.

10. S. Mark, “HOIS recommended practice for statistical analysis of inspection data – issue 1”, HOIS, 2013.

11. R. Howard and F. Cegla, “The effect of pits of different sizes
on ultrasonic shear wave signals,” in Proc. AIP Conference Proceedings, Aug. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5031544.

12. D. Benstock et al., “The influence of surface roughness on ultrasonic thickness measurements”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2014, vol. 136, no. 6, pp.3028–3039. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4900565.

 

Fellow’s Corner – Nov/ Dec 25

Fellow’s Corner – Nov/ Dec 25

This series of articles is intended to highlight industry-wide engineering experience, guidance and focussed advice to practising technologists. It is written by ICorr Fellows who have made significant contributions to the field of Corrosion Management.

Can Corrosion Be a Help Rather Than a Hindrance?

Gareth Hinds, PhD, FICorr, EFC President, ICorr Past President

Meet the Author

Gareth Hinds

Dr Gareth Hinds is Senior NPL Fellow and Fellow of the Institute of Corrosion. He is Science Area Leader in the Electrochemistry Group at the National Physical Laboratory in Teddington, United Kingdom. His primary expertise is in the development of novel in situ diagnostic techniques and standard test methods for assessment of corrosion and material degradation in energy applications. Gareth is a Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering and holds visiting professorships at UCL, the University of Strathclyde, Harbin Institute of Technology and the Institute of Corrosion Science & Technology, Guangzhou. He is the author of over 200 publications and is currently
President of the European Federation of Corrosion.

Corrosion is often viewed in a negative light. It can lead to premature failure of metallic components and infrastructure, with significant economic, environmental and safety-related consequences. As ICorr members, we’re only too familiar with the need to combat this ever-present threat. However, in the right circumstances corrosion can also be exploited as a force for good! This Fellows Corner article takes a closer look at some examples.

Galvanic Cells

Corrosion is an electrochemical phenomenon involving the transfer of electrons and ions between conducting surfaces in contact with an electrolyte. It can therefore be harnessed in a controlled way to produce electrical power. When a battery is discharging, it acts as a galvanic cell, analogous to galvanic corrosion of two dissimilar metals, with the negative electrode acting as the anode and the positive electrode as the cathode. Control is achieved by isolating the electrodes from each other using an insulating porous separator, typically a polymer or ceramic. When the battery terminals are connected to an electrical load, usable DC current will flow. The first battery was the Voltaic pile [1], which was invented by Alessandro Volta in 1800. This consisted of alternating discs of zinc and copper separated by strips of cloth soaked in brine. The anodic reaction was corrosion of zinc, with hydrogen evolution on copper as the cathodic reaction. The Voltaic pile played a central role in the discovery of water electrolysis by Carlisle and Nicholson [2] in 1800 (only a few months after its invention) and in the isolation of chemical elements (Na, K, Ca, B, Ba, Sr and Mg) by Humphry Davy [3] in the early 1800s.

Figure 1: Statue of Alessandro Volta In His Birthplace of Como, Italy, Featuring His Voltaic Pile [1], The Forerunner of The Modern Battery.

Please Note: this article considers only spontaneous (galvanic) reactions in order to be consistent with real corrosion processes. Electrolytic processes are excluded. The scope is also restricted to electrochemical corrosion of metals to keep things relatively simple.

Volta mistakenly thought that the operation of his battery was a consequence of static electricity and seems to have used it mainly to deliver electric shocks to unsuspecting volunteers. It wasn’t until the 1830s that Michael Faraday demonstrated the electrochemical basis of its operation. Nevertheless, Volta’s invention and its subsequent evolution formed the basis for electricity generation throughout most of the 19th century, until the discovery of the electrical generator in 1870.

Today, batteries are playing a vital role in decarbonisation of our energy system, most notably in electric vehicles and grid storage. Unlike most forms of corrosion, the electrochemical reactions in some batteries are reversible. Examples include lithium-ion and lead-acid batteries, which can be charged and discharged many times over their lifetime. If only all corrosion reactions behaved in the same way!

Another well-established electrochemical technology that operates under the same galvanic principle is the use of sacrificial anodes to prevent corrosion. Anodic dissolution of the more active metal (usually an alloy of magnesium, aluminium or zinc) allows the more noble metal (normally steel) to remain protected under conditions in which it would otherwise freely corrode. This is the basis for cathodic protection of a wide range of infrastructure, including pipelines, storage tanks, marine structures and reinforced concrete.

Like batteries, cathodic protection has a long history, dating back to 1824 when Humphry Davy used iron anodes to protect copper sheathing on the hull of HMS Samarang [4]. While this did prove highly effective in preventing the copper from corroding, it was soon observed that marine biofouling had increased dramatically, as copper ions were no longer being released in sufficient quantity to kill the microorganisms. Since biofouling creates drag that slows down the ship, the Royal Navy decided that on balance it was better just to let the copper corrode, highlighting yet another beneficial effect of corrosion!

Surface Modification

Corrosion of a metal surface can be advantageous if it leads to the formation of a highly protective film. This is the case with weathering steels used in the construction industry. When exposed to atmospheric conditions, these steels initially corrode like mild steel but over time a dense, stable, patina forms that effectively prevents any further corrosion and is self-healing if damaged. This leads to huge cost savings in that no painting is required and maintenance costs are minimal.

Weathering steel was introduced in 1933 by US Steel as a high strength material for coal wagons in the railway industry. The steel composition had been developed by trial and error over many decades and it was entirely by chance that its corrosion resistant properties emerged. It was trademarked as ‘Corten’ steel – ‘Cor’ for ‘corrosion resistance’ and ‘ten’ for ‘tensile strength’. The mechanism behind the establishment of a corrosion-resistant patina is still not fully understood but it’s clear that wetting and drying cycles are required and that copper is the most important alloying element. Of course, care should be taken not to use weathering steels in environments where a protective patina does not form. This will often be the case if the steel remains continuously wet or is exposed to high levels of chloride. Similarly, service experience shows that the patina forms more effectively in industrial and urban environments than in rural environments where atmospheric corrosion rates are much lower.

The most famous example of the use of weathering steels in the UK is probably the Angel of the North statue in Gateshead, which is seen by an estimated 33 million people every year due to its elevated position close to major North-East road and rail arteries [5]. Erected in February 1998, it was designed by sculptor Anthony Gormley and stands 20m tall with a wingspan of 54m. Most of Gormley’s work is in bronze, but in this case weathering steel had to be used to provide sufficient strength to withstand periods of high wind.

Figure 2: The Angel of The North Statue In Gateshead [5] Was Constructed From Weathering Steel Due To Its Combination of Mechanical Strength And Corrosion Resistance. Image Source: Saw2th CC BY SA 2.0.

The widespread use of aluminium, stainless steel and other corrosion resistant alloys also depends on the formation and self-healing properties of a protective oxide layer in a range of aqueous environments. Here, the balance between metal ion dissolution and oxide formation governs the level of protection offered by the passive film. Passivation is a direct consequence of corrosion; without this critical phenomenon many engineering alloys would be completely useless!

Another advantageous surface modification that can arise from corrosion is crack tip blunting. Stress corrosion cracking, where stress and a corrosive environment combine with a susceptible microstructure to generate fracture well below the yield stress of the material, is a common failure mechanism in many industrial applications. Initiation and propagation of stress corrosion cracks depends on the presence of stress raisers such as corrosion pits and crack tips. However, when the corrosion rate is sufficiently high, dissolution of the metal can round off the sharp edges of the crack tip, significantly reducing the stress concentration factor and arresting crack growth. This can be useful as a means of mitigating crack development, but a balance is clearly needed as if the corrosion rate is too high other issues will emerge.

Selective Material Removal

Chemical etching is a well-established manufacturing process whereby corrosion is actively employed to achieve selective removal of material from a metallic component to realise the desired final shape. A masking material is often used to protect areas of the surface where material removal is not desired.

Very precise control of component shape can be achieved through the application of a photo-resistive material, a light-sensitive polymer that is stable in the etchant, to the entire surface. Prior to the etching step, exposure to light through a patterned mask can either weaken or strengthen the photoresist material, allowing removal of selected areas with an appropriate solvent.

The etching process can be used to manufacture highly intricate and complex shapes for a range of important applications, including aerospace, automotive, medical, microelectronics and energy conversion and storage devices. This avoids the issues of burrs and residual stresses that can be introduced by mechanical milling.

The earliest known application of chemical etching comes from ancient Egypt, where it was used to inscribe jewellery with hieroglyphs and images of deities. This was carried out in a relatively crude manner using rudimentary acids and abrasion. The process became more sophisticated over time with the invention of acid baths in the 15th century and modern etchants developed during the Industrial Revolution.

In metallography, acid etching is a well-established technique for microstructural characterisation of metals and alloys. A common etchant is nitric acid, which tends to remove material in the grain boundaries more rapidly than the grains themselves, making the microstructure easier to see in an optical microscope. This allows visualisation of grain size, phase segregation and inclusions that can be linked to the properties of the material.

Aesthetics

The products of corrosion can display a wide range of pleasing colours due to the optical properties of metal oxides. Energy is absorbed and released by electrons as they transition between energy states in the metal atom when interacting with light. Every metal oxide exhibits a distinctive colour that depends on the metal, its oxidation state and the surrounding chemical environment. For example, iron oxides are mostly reddish-brown, cobalt oxide is blue and magnesium oxide is white.

The green-blue patina that forms over time when copper is exposed to atmospheric corrosion is copper carbonate. This patina is not only visually attractive but also highly protective of the underlying metal. Famous landmarks incorporating this feature include the Statue of Liberty, the Kremlin Palace and Berlin Cathedral. However, one of the major drawbacks of the use of copper in less high-profile structures is that it is often targeted by thieves for its high resale value. In February 2017 for example, St Peter’s Church in Kirby Bellars near Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire, faced a £70k repair bill after the theft of a large amount of copper from its roof [6]. Sadly, this is becoming an increasingly common issue, particularly in rural communities.

Figure 3: The Striking Colour of The Domes on Berlin Cathedral is A Result of Prolonged Atmospheric Corrosion of Copper.

Pigments are products of corrosion that exhibit colour and have been used in art since antiquity. Use of pigments dates back 400,000 years to early humans who used yellow ochre (hydrous iron oxide) for ritual painting. Red ochre (anhydrous iron oxide) features heavily in cave paintings from the Neolithic period, such as those found at Lascaux in France. Early pigments used by artists were based on minerals and clays, although these have now been largely supplanted by modern synthetic variants.

Corrosion can even be an art form in itself. Jean Kittel, a researcher at IFP Energie Nouvelles in Lyon, France, has created a collection of artwork based on corroded metal, including copper, bronze and iron [7]. This impressive work was highlighted recently when two of his pieces were selected as prizes for a scavenger hunt that took place to mark 2025 World Corrosion Awareness Day [8].

Figure 4: Artwork By Jean Kittel [7] In Which A Corroded Polishing Disc is Printed With Prussian Blue And Sanguine Inks. Image Provided By Jean Kittel.

Material Functionality

The presence of a corrosion reaction can add considerable value if it leads to an improvement in the functionality of a material. Often the corrosion process is intentionally incorporated into the material or component design for maximum benefit.

Biodegradable medical implants are designed to be dissolved completely via corrosion once their primary function has been completed, thereby avoiding the need for a second surgery to remove them. The majority of these are organic or polymer-based but this is not possible for orthopaedic implants, where metals are required due to their higher load-bearing capacity.

In contrast to their well-established corrosion-resistant counterparts, such as titanium and cobalt-based alloys, metallic biodegradable implants are typically based on magnesium and zinc alloys that are much more susceptible to corrosion in the environment of the human body [9]. This is still an emerging area, with further research required to optimise design and implementation.

Just a small amount of corrosion of the steel reinforcement bars (rebars) in reinforced concrete enhances adherence of the concrete to the steel [10]. This is due to a combination of increased surface area and the expansion of the iron oxide to fill voids between the steel and the concrete. Of course, all benefit is lost at higher corrosion rates as the expansion of the oxide then creates stresses that lead to debonding and cracking of the concrete.

In alkaline water electrolysis, stainless steel catalysts can become activated by corrosion, leading to higher rates of hydrogen production [11]. Selective etching of the surface, particularly of chromium, leads to the formation of a nanostructured, porous surface layer that is rich in catalytically-active nickel and iron oxides. Again, caution is required as there is a trade-off between activity and stability that can be challenging to manage.

More generally, corrosion accelerates nutrient cycling in ecosystems by breaking down minerals in rocks and making them available to living organisms. So it’s also a vital component in keeping us alive and healthy.

Summary

It’s clear that there are many positive aspects of corrosion that, when used and controlled in the right way, are highly beneficial in a range of important applications. As always, there’s a balance, and care needs to be taken that any downsides are well mitigated.

However, there’s one additional major benefit that shouldn’t be overlooked. Let’s not forget that corrosion keeps most people reading this in business! Metals will always revert to their oxides if we do not intervene judiciously. For this I guess we ought to be thankful!

References

[1] A. Volta, On the Electricity of the Pile, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, September 1800.

[2] T. Smolinka et al., Chapter 4 – The History of water electrolysis from its beginnings to the present, Electrochemical Power Sources: Fundamentals, Systems, and Applications 83, 2022.

[3] J.L. Marshall, Humphry Davy and the Voltaic Pile, Chem 13 News Magazine, April 2019.

[4] H. Davy, Additional experiments and observations on the application of electrical combinations to the preservation of the copper sheathing of ships and to other purposes, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, January 1824.

[5] P.J. Nicholson, Antony Gormley, The Angel of the North, 1998, Occupational Medicine 68, 352, 2018.

[6] https://www.meltontimes.co.uk/news/crime/raiders-make-off-with-copper-sheeting-from-kirby-bellars-church-roof-2105331.

[7] https://www.jean-kittel-estampes.com/.

[8] https://www.ampp.org/blogs/
webmasternaceorg/2025/04/14/ampp-joins-global-effort-of-corrosion-prevention.

[9] B. Xia, Y. Liu, Y. Xing, Z. Shi, X. Pan, Biodegradable medical implants: reshaping future medical practice, Advanced Science 12, e08014, 2025.

[10] A. Ouglova et al., The influence of crrosion on bond properties between concrete and reinforcement in concrete structures, Materials and Structures 41, 969, 2007.

[11] Y. Zuo et al., Stainless steel activation for efficient alkaline oxygen evolution in advanced electrolyzers, Advanced Materials 36, 2312071, 2024.

Young ICorr Updates

Young ICorr Updates

The Young ICorr Committee has been hard at work developing many schemes, events, and initiatives to support the early career members of ICorr – here’s an update of what we’re working on and how you can get involved!

Social Buzz: Manchester Pub Quiz Success

Our recent Pub Quiz social event in Manchester was a hit! With a fantastic turnout and glowing feedback, it proved the power of informal networking in bringing young professionals together. Laughter, learning, and lively competition made for an unforgettable evening.

Photos: YICorr Chair Pub Quiz

Other Young ICorr Initiatives
Skills for Corrosionists – Online Training Programme In partnership with the Midlands Branch, we’re launching the Skills for Corrosionists online training series in the new year. These sessions are designed to empower participants with essential non-technical skills, including entrepreneurship, communication, personal branding and leadership, to complement their technical expertise. Register at: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/icorr-skills-for-corrosionists-webinar-series-launch-entrepreneurship-tickets-1838991335589 Expanding Horizons: European Collaborations We are working closely with the EFC to develop Young ICorr and Young EFC events for Eurocorr 2026, boosting our international presence and fostering cross-border collaboration. Regional Engagement: Yorkshire and North-West Young ICorr is also teaming up with the Yorkshire and North-West branches to deliver tailored events for young members – bringing opportunities closer to home and strengthening our regional networks.

Mentorship Matters: Launching Soon
We’re gearing up to launch the Young ICorr Mentorship Scheme, offering structured career guidance and support for early-career professionals. We’re currently seeking mentors and mentees for the pilot phase – if you’re passionate about nurturing the next generation or would like one-to-one guidance in your career, we’d love to hear from you!

Introducing the Young ICorr Awards – Celebrating the Future of Corrosion

We’re thrilled to announce the launch of the Young ICorr Awards, a prestigious new initiative from the Institute of Corrosion that shines a spotlight on the next generation of corrosion professionals. These awards recognise outstanding early-career engineers and scientists who are making significant contributions to corrosion prevention, research, and innovation. With categories including Young Corrosion Engineer of the Year and Young Corrosion Scientist of the Year, this is a unique opportunity to gain national recognition, connect with industry leaders, and accelerate your professional journey. Visit the Young ICorr section of the website to nominate!

Young Engineers Programme (YEP): Global Reach

Following a successful launch at Eurocorr 2025, the Young Engineers Programme has attracted many applicants worldwide – the successful candidates have been chosen, and we’re now focused on assembling a stellar team of mentors, lecturers, and a compelling case study. Interested in contributing? Get in touch!

Sponsorship Drive: Fuelling the Future

To support YEP and Young ICorr’s growing initiatives, we’ve developed a comprehensive sponsorship proposal and are actively engaging with companies to secure funding. This support will be vital in expanding our reach and impact. If you or your company are interested in supporting the future of corrosion, please get in touch!

The Young ICorr Committee is buzzing with activity and ambition. We’re always open to new collaborations and welcome anyone interested in joining our journey. For further information about YICorr activities, please contact: Dr Kathleen Purnell
Email: youngicorrchair@icorr.org

Corrosion Science  Division (CSD) Updates

Corrosion Science Division (CSD) Updates

The 67th Corrosion Science Symposium (CSS) was held jointly with Electrochem2025 at the University of Northumbria, between the 31st August and 2nd September 2025. The CSS has been held annually since its launch in 1960 by Prof. L.L. Shreir.

The symposium is always an ideal opportunity for students and early-career researchers in corrosion science from across the UK and Europe to congregate, discuss their work, share ideas and, above all, enjoy themselves in a stimulating/friendly environment. This year there were 10 talks and 13 posters, and the UR Evans award plenary talk was given by Prof. Herman Terryn (Vrije University, Brussels).

Photo: Plenary Lecture by Professor Ritu Kataky.

In his plenary lecture, Prof. Herman Terryn (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) explores why this goal has long seemed utopian—and how recent advances are bringing it closer to reality. The quest to accurately predict the lifetime of metals remains one of the most pressing challenges in corrosion science. Current industry practice relies on accelerated laboratory tests and long-term field exposure to estimate durability. However, laboratory tests often fail to replicate real-world conditions, while field trials can take up to a decade, slowing innovation. Prof. Terryn’s research aims to bridge this gap by developing a comprehensive platform for predicting the long-term performance of organic-coated metals under realistic environmental ageing. His team combines cutting-edge electrochemical techniques, in situ surface analysis, and advanced finite element modelling, now enhanced with sensors and machine learning. The lecture also introduces VIPCOAT, an EU Horizon 2020 project creating an open innovation platform to design sustainable coating systems and accelerated life tests. Initially targeting aeronautics, VIPCOAT will expand to other sectors, leveraging standardised European Materials Modelling Ontologies. The plenary talk expertly underscored a paradigm shift: from empirical testing toward data-driven, predictive corrosion science, thus paving the way for more sustainable and efficient materials design. 

Photo: UR Evans Award to Professor Herman Terryn by ICorr President Dr Yunnan Gao.

Highlights from Electrochem2025: Advances in Corrosion Science The Corrosion Science and Engineering symposium at Electrochem2025 featured several outstanding contributions. Harry Tookey (University of Leeds) presented an insightful study on the effect of salinity on corrosion product characteristics and inhibitor performance in geothermal environments. His work demonstrated how varying NaCl concentrations influence FeCO3 formation on X65 carbon steel and inhibitor efficiency, offering practical guidance for corrosion control in high-salinity systems.

Anjali John (University of Warwick) gave a talk on the initial stages of anodic corrosion of boron-doped diamond electrodes. Using advanced in situ and ex situ techniques, her research provided a rare glimpse into early corrosion mechanisms under extreme electrochemical oxidation conditions, critical for improving electrode durability in advanced oxidation processes.

Photo: Talk by Anjali John (University of Warwick).

Mohammadhasan Sarabchi (University of Leeds) addressed the challenge of corrosion inhibition in geothermal systems with his presentation on optimising multi-component surfactant mixtures. By combining kinetic modelling with electrochemical testing, he identified formulations that deliver rapid adsorption and strong persistence, paving the way for more sustainable and effective inhibitor strategies. These talks exemplify the innovative approaches currently providing new insights in corrosion science – bridging fundamental understanding with real-world applications.

Photo: Mohamadhasan Sarabchi – Corrosion Inhibitors & Geothermal Energy EPSRC Researcher at University of Leeds.

Harry Tookey was awarded the Shreir Prize 2025 for the best early career research presentation.

Photo: Harry Tookey 

For further information about Corrosion Science Division (CSD) activities, please contact: Julian Wharton (Chair) Email: csdchair@icorr.org