ETGB Corner – Expanding our Training Portfolio

ETGB Corner – Expanding our Training Portfolio

ETGB Corner – Chair’s Opening Remarks

I’m pleased to share an update on our ongoing work to strengthen and expand ICorr training portfolio. High quality, industry relevant training remains central to our mission, and the ETGB continues to focus on developing programmes that support both the profession and the wider civic community.

This month, we are delighted to introduce two courses. The first is Corrosion Mechanisms in Stainless Steel, a joint, focused and technically rich programme designed to deepen understanding of stainless steel behaviour across a range of industrial environments. The second is the newly reviewed Corrosion at Home and Its Prevention course, scheduled for rollout in Q3 of 2026. This updated version reinforces our commitment to making corrosion awareness accessible to the wider public, helping individuals make informed decisions and enhance safety in everyday settings.

We are also keen to broaden participation in course development. There is a valuable opportunity for experienced corrosion professionals to share their knowledge and help shape future training modules. Equally, we encourage young engineers, scientists, and those pursuing chartership or continuing professional development (CPD) to engage with these programmes as a way of strengthening their technical foundation and advancing their careers.

As always, the ETGB remains committed to delivering training that reflects the highest standards of professionalism, relevance, and technical excellence. We look forward to continued collaboration across the community as we build the next generation of corrosion-related learning.

For anyone interested in developing a corrosion-related course or registering for upcoming training, please contact Dr Tony Rizk at ETGBChair@icorr.org

 

ICorr Training: CPGB – Improving  our Candidate Experience

ICorr Training: CPGB – Improving our Candidate Experience

Overall, 2025 was a very strong year for the CP Training Scheme, running 32 courses with high course occupancy rates, nevertheless we have identified a range of improvements that shall be implemented from 2026 onwards to strengthen further our position.

We are currently seeking additional tutors for Concrete and Marine Application Sectors in 2026. We have also identified our first Overseas Tutor for commencing courses in KSA, who is a member of CPGB and an ISO 15257 Level 4 ICorr CP certificated Aramco Engineer. Courses in KSA should enable candidates from Libya, Algeria and the Gulf countries to attend who would otherwise struggle to obtain UK visas.

In addition to the requirement to update the course notes to better serve international audiences, we are also addressing now concerns about the quality of the course notes and course presentations more generally and looking to align them better with industry requirements.

Further, we have recently completed an internal audit of examination paper structures across application sectors, and a more uniform approach to examinations is being devised and implemented, which should ensure candidates are examined more robustly.

Facility wise, a new Marine CP teaching site at the Port of Blyth is now in planning. The intention is to use the facility to target the Renewable (Offshore Wind) market both in Europe and the UK. There is also the potential to target ROV Operators with a potential future Level 1 Marine course. This will compliment our two UK-based Training Centres at Telford (Fressyinet) for Marine, Concrete and Buried courses and Argyll Ruane at Sheffield [also teaching our Buried courses].

There remains the possibility of opening a further future facility in Aberdeen, subject to demand. However, the Port of Blyth is currently the preferred option for development.

Please contact Ben Magee, CPGB Chair who can assist with any further queries. Email: cpgbchair@icorr.org

Corrosion in Infrastructure:  The Glasgow M8 Woodside Viaduct Repairs

Corrosion in Infrastructure: The Glasgow M8 Woodside Viaduct Repairs

Dr Shagufta Khan, Editor, CMJ and Stephen Tate, ICorr Immediate Past President

Introduction

Corrosion-related deterioration of major transport infrastructure continues to pose significant safety, operational and financial challenges across the United Kingdom. Few projects illustrate this more vividly than the ongoing refurbishment of the M8 Woodside Viaducts in central Glasgow — a complex engineering task that has attracted national attention due to its scale, cost, technical difficulty and prolonged impact on one of Scotland’s busiest motorway corridors.

Constructed between 1969 and 1971, the twin elevated viaducts at Woodside carry approximately 150,000 vehicles daily through the densest urban section of the M8 motorway. They form a critical link between junctions 16 and 17 near Charing Cross, bridging tightly constrained city streets, long-established residential areas, and Glasgow’s historic subway tunnels.

When extensive corrosion damage was discovered in 2021, particularly to the reinforced concrete crossheads supporting the decks, an immediate programme of lane restrictions and emergency propping was introduced to ensure continued safe operation. The scale of deterioration, combined with constant environmental exposure, ageing materials, and multiple layers
of historic modification, has since led to a multi-year project of unprecedented complexity. Costs have risen from an estimated £81 million to between £126 million and £152 million, while the completion date has shifted from 2023 to the second half
of 2027.

This article summarises the historic context of the viaducts, the corrosion and structural challenges identified, the bespoke engineering solutions implemented, and the wider lessons for long-term asset integrity management of the UK’s post-war transport infrastructure.

 

Photo: The Twin Elevated Woodside Viaducts Between Junctions 16 and 17 of The M8 Through Glasgow – a Critical Transport Artery Now Undergoing Major Corrosion Related Repairs, Image Courtesy of Transport Scotland.

Background: Completing the North Flank of Glasgow’s Inner Ring Road

The Woodside Viaducts form part of the ambitious Glasgow Inner Ring Road, a post-war urban motorway system planned in the 1940s and formalised in the 1962 Interim Report on the Glasgow Inner Ring Road. Delivered by Scott Wilson Kirkpatrick and Partners, the north flank — including Townhead Interchange and the Woodside Section — was among the most technically ambitious civil engineering works undertaken in Glasgow in the late 1960s.

Construction of Woodside motorway section progressed in two stages:

Stage 1 (1967–1968)

Connected Townhead Interchange to Craighall Road.

• Included distributor roads, pedestrian routes, and major alterations to surface streets.

• Integrated American-style elements such as Botts’ Dots (tactile lane markers), reflecting the influence of US freeway design.

• Prepared foundations and approach routes for the elevated viaducts to be built in Stage 2.

Stage 2 (1969–1971)

Created the twin multi-span Woodside Viaducts, 365 m and 460 m long.

• Utilised precast, post-tensioned concrete beams, up to 80 tonnes each, to maintain traffic flows on surface streets during erection.

• Included seven road bridges, two footbridges, two underpasses and eleven retaining walls.

• Introduced advanced pre-casting techniques and a dedicated casting yard, achieving up to 12 beams per week.

The viaducts were engineered for a 50-mph design speed and projected traffic flows of 100,000 vehicles per day — a volume vastly exceeded today.

Widening Works of the 1990s

By the early 1990s, traffic congestion on the north flank had reached unsustainable levels. Strathclyde Regional Council initiated a widening scheme that added an additional running lane in each direction between Townhead and St George’s Cross.

At Woodside:

The westbound viaduct was significantly widened.

• Abutments were reconstructed and hard shoulders removed in sections.

• New supports and pier modifications were introduced.

• Ramp metering was introduced at J16 in a UK first.

• The design accommodated space originally reserved for future M8 connections.

These works altered load paths, increased carriageway capacity, and added new structural elements – all of which significantly complicate today’s repair strategy, especially where old and new materials interact under environmental exposure.

Structural Investigations: Deterioration Revealed (2020–2021)

Routine inspections in late 2020 and early 2021 revealed worrying signs of structural degradation, prompting more detailed testing.

Key findings included:

1. Severe deterioration of concrete crossheads

These reinforced concrete elements sit atop the piers and support the precast beams.

• Chloride-induced corrosion of steel reinforcement was extensive. • Concrete cracking, spalling and section loss were discovered.
• Freeze–thaw cycling exacerbated deterioration, particularly on exposed edges.
• Saturation due to long-term water ingress had accelerated the damage.

Photo: Crosshead Deterioration Between Beams M8 Woodside Viaduct, Image Courtesy of New Civil Engineer and Transport Scotland.

Photo: Crosshead Deterioration Between Beams M8 Woodside Viaduct, Image Courtesy of New Civil Engineer and Transport Scotland.

2. Water ingress and salt contamination

Decades of exposure due to:

• De-icing salts used in winter had created a highly aggressive environment for both steel and concrete.

• Leaking drainage channels.

• Rainwater run-off from the deck.

3. Load-carrying capacity concerns

Finite element modelling and physical testing indicated that the worst-affected crossheads were no longer provided margins of safety required for 150,000+ daily vehicles.

4. Immediate safety actions

In March 2021:

• Plans for temporary propping were accelerated.
• Restrictive traffic management was introduced.
• Several slip roads were closed.
• The M8 was reduced from four lanes to two in each direction.

The deterioration was more severe than historic records predicted, partly due to a lack of accurate information about hidden structurally relevant elements and services together with the ageing nature of the structures.

Corrosion Mechanisms: Understanding the Root Causes

The degradation at Woodside is a case study in long-term corrosion processes affecting post-tensioned concrete infrastructure.

Chloride Ingress

• Road salts had penetrated the concrete cover over five decades.

• Chlorides de-passivated the steel reinforcement.

• Localised pitting corrosion had occurred, affecting flexural capacity (ability to resist bending stresses).

Figure: Chloride Induced Pitting Reinforced Concrete, Image Courtesy of CTL Qatar.

Water Ingress

Persistent leaks (through poor maintenance) and saturated concrete created an ideal environment for corrosion.

Carbonation

Although not the primary deterioration mechanism, carbonation also lowered local pH and weakened concrete at exposed edges.

Hidden Defects from 1960s Construction

Common to many 1960s infrastructure assets that are now reaching the end of their design life.

Historic concrete mixes, workmanship variations, and the use of early post-tensioning systems all contributed to long-term vulnerability and risk of failure in service.

The Repair Strategy: Temporary Steel Propping Systems

To ensure public safety while permanent repairs were developed, engineers adopted an extensive temporary works strategy involving bespoke steel propping at 23x locations.

Design Challenges

Each propping location required a unique solution because of:
• Confined urban spaces.
• Differing pier heights and geometries.
• Interaction with sensitive public utilities.
• Poor or incomplete historic documentation.
• Proximity to Glasgow’s subway tunnels.
• The discovery of an uncharted sewer, which forced redesign and replanning.
• Variable ground conditions

Construction Approach

Each propping location required a unique solution because of:

1. Excavation and piling began in August 2021.

2. High-level steel structures were built to surround and bypass the weakened crossheads.

3. Props were installed progressively from February 2022 onwards.

4. Heavy-duty steel frames transferred live loads away from damaged concrete to the new supports.

5. Propping allowed engineers to undertake investigation, strengthening and reconstruction works without removing the viaduct from service.

Complexity and Safety

This remains one of the most intricate civil temporary-works projects ever undertaken in Scotland. The bespoke nature of the props, complicated interfaces with buried utilities, and need to maintain motorway operation above and city street access below have significantly extended the construction timeline.

Traffic Management and Urban Constraints

The Woodside Viaducts sit in one of the most constrained transport corridors in Scotland. Key challenges included:

• Accommodating diversions through narrow Victorian streets.

• Avoiding disruption to the transport tunnels, which run beneath the structure.

• Ensuring safe pedestrian routes near schools and residential areas.

• Maintaining movement for 150,000+ vehicles per day.

Preserving access beneath the viaduct for residents, businesses and emergency services.

• Working alongside major utility networks (water, gas, power, telecoms).

A new slip road at Junction 17 was constructed to improve westbound traffic flows. Diversions via St George’s Road, Garscube Road and West Graham Street have been essential to maintain operational capacity.

Cost Escalation and Programme Delays

The project’s rising costs and extended schedule reflect its unique challenges:

• Original estimate: £81 million.

• Revised estimate (2024): £126–£152 million.

• Initial completion date: late 2023.

• Current projected completion:

o Eastbound reopening: Autumn 2026.
o Full completion (Westbound): Second half of 2027

Reasons for escalation include:

• Complexity of designing 23x bespoke propping systems.
• Discovery of an uncharted deep sewer.
• Extended traffic management requirements.
• Global supply chain and material price volatility.
• Interference with buried utilities.
• Need for additional strengthening once deterioration. was fully mapped.
• Unexpected ground conditions.

Progress to Date (as of August 2025)

• 13 of 23x propping locations had been completed. • Significant strengthening works were underway.
• Permanent repair solutions were being finalised.
• Eastbound viaduct projected for reopening in 2026 and Westbound to follow in 2027.
• Structural health monitoring and inspection access. improvements have been planned.

Photo: One of 23x Temporary Props Required for Repairs to M8 Woodside Viaduct, Image Courtesy of ALAMY.

Lessons for UK Infrastructure and Asset Integrity

The Woodside Viaduct project offers wider lessons for the UK’s post-war transport infrastructure.

1. Improved Structural Health Monitoring (SHM)
Permanent SHM systems should be installed on major elevated structures to detect early signs of deterioration.
2. Accurate Records are Essential
Historic discrepancies in utility and structural records have caused major delays and redesigns.
3. Concrete Crossheads are Vulnerable
Many 1960s–70s viaducts use similar reinforced concrete supports and are now approaching end-of-life.
4. Climate and Urban Pollution Accelerate Corrosion Increasing rainfall*, higher ambient temperature, more frequent heatwaves, de-icing salt use and air pollution can all intensify reinforcement corrosion.

* The average rainfall in Scotland between 2010-19 was 9% wetter than the 1961-90 average.

 

Figure: Annual Mean PM2.5 Concentration at Glasgow Monitoring Sites 2015-2022 (Source: Scottish Air Quality).

Forecasts for peak’ summer temperatures range from 28°C (1980-2010) to 32°C (2050s) and by the 2070s will reach 34°C.

Figure: Temperature Data for Glasgow M8 Routing (Source: European Data Journalism Network).

5. Temporary Works must be Considered in Lifecycle Planning Large-scale propping operations can cost tens of millions and extend programme durations by years

6. Multi-Disciplinary Coordination is Critical
Urban viaduct repairs require enormous planning and collaboration between civil engineers, corrosion specialists, transport planners, utility companies and local authorities.

Summary

The Glasgow M8 Woodside Viaducts refurbishment is one
of Scotland’s most complex and significant corrosion-related infrastructure projects in recent decades. Built in the late 1960s and heavily modified in the 1990s, the viaducts have suffered extensive deterioration driven by chloride ingress, water penetration and long-term environmental exposure.

The discovery of severe crosshead deterioration in 2021 triggered lane restrictions and a multi-year emergency propping programme involving 23x bespoke structures.

Complicated interfaces with utilities, subway tunnels and densely built-up streets, combined with escalating material costs and discovery of an uncharted sewer, have pushed costs to above £150 million and moved completion to 2027. Alongside this, there was a significant campaign mounted to remove the previous scar through the city left by the building of the urban motorway and to restore lost residential areas and parkland.

Despite all of these challenges, the project is now advancing steadily. Once completed, the viaducts will have renewed structural capacity, enhanced durability and improved inspection access — securing the long-term future of a critical component of Scotland’s motorway network.

As with the past refurbishment of Edinburgh’s North Bridge featured in Corrosion Management July/August 2025 corrosion_ management_issue186lo-res.pdf this project serves as a timely reminder of the importance of planned maintenance, accurate records, modern corrosion and structural monitoring systems, and proactive asset management for the UK’s ageing civil infrastructure.

References

1. https://climatereadyclyde.org.uk/wp-content/
uploads/2019/10/GlasgowCityRegion_Heatwave-Report-CRC_web.pdf

2. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckgjl1mlr30o

3. https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/propping-and-repair-works-on-m8-viaducts-in-glasgow-see-71m-cost-hike-and-3-year-extension-30-05-2024/

4. https://www.scottishroadsarchive.org/woodside

5.https://www.standardsforhighways.co.uk/tses/attachments/a23595e2-7ef5-4771-bde3-a47225126d6d?inline=true

6. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdkSymmeNBE

7. M8 Woodside Viaducts J16 – J17

8. Transport Scotland’s Approach to Climate Change Adaptation and Resilience

9. Woodside viaduct hi-res stock photography and images – Alamy

10. The Dividing Road: How the M8 Motorway Destroyed Glasgow’s Communities – Retrospect Journal

11. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13604813.2 025.2522014

 

YEP Journeys – Diary  Reflections from AMPP Nashville

YEP Journeys – Diary Reflections from AMPP Nashville

Editor’s Note: We are pleased to have the opportunity to publish the 4th of our series of dairies from the YEP 24 winners.

Corrosion, Sustainability and Communication at AMPP 2025 – Amy Johnstone

My name is Amy Johnstone, and I work in the offshore structures team at Kent. Originally graduating as a mechanical engineer in 2017, I worked in various mechanical engineering and technical advisory roles before starting my current job as a structural engineer in May 2023. Over this time, I began to work more and more on materials and corrosion scopes, including my current role as a materials and corrosion engineer on the Berwick Bank and Mona and Morgan offshore wind farms. All that means is I get to work on a rich variety of interesting projects, but that I panic a bit when people ask me what sort of engineer I am. I applied to the Institute of Corrosion’s Young Engineers Programme because I wanted to delve a bit deeper and back up my on-the-job learning by picking up where my Chemistry GCSE left off.

After a year-long programme of lectures and mentoring, I was delighted when my team won the award for best case study presentation and the opportunity to attend the AMPP 2025 Conference and Expo. One of the key themes I noticed cutting across a wide variety of technical presentations was how corrosion engineers can support sustainability objectives. In the following sections, I will delve into just two of the many insightful technical presentations and panel discussions which were in one way or another related to this topic.

ILife Cycle Check of Anode Alloys for Cathodic Protection of Marine Energy Infrastructure [1]

Lisbeth Rischel Hilbert – Associate Partner, IPU

Every product or asset that engineers may work on has a wide range of localised and remote impacts on the environment during extraction, manufacturing, installation, use and disposal. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) may be used to assess and quantify these impacts [2]; however, thecomprehensiveness required to produce a good LCA means that it can be unwieldy and difficult to complete if there are several unknowns. A Life Cycle Check (LCC) methodology has been put forward as a lighter touch alternative to an LCA, following the same principles but targeting the check towards limited areas of interest to inform decision-making.

In this presentation, Lisbeth Hilbert presented IPU’s work using an LCC methodology to compare two different aluminium anode alloys given in ISO 9351:2025 [3], alloys “A3” and “A5”. A key difference between the two is that A5 has a lower zinc content than A3, 0.3% to 0.8% mass fraction compared to 4.75% to 5.75%. In the marine environment, toxicity of materials to the surrounding ecosystem is a key concern and therefore an important facet to consider in the LCC. Studies such as Ebeling et al. 2023 [4] have shown that metal emissions from galvanic anodes on offshore structures can be found in the surface sediments in the surrounding environment. As offshore wind is set to play a key part in a transition to a more sustainable energy system, initiatives such as the Anemoi programme [5] have been set up to better understand these effects of metal emissions and the available mitigations. Another dimension of sustainability examined in the LCC was Global Warming Potential (GWP). This is a complex measure that depends greatly on extraction, manufacturing and transportation methods. To illustrate this, a comparison was made between the same anode for use in a North Sea wind farm, manufactured in either Brazil or Iceland, which clearly showed
the benefits to GWP from siting manufacturing in places with a higher proportion of renewables in the energy mix and reducing transportation distances.

Overall, the A3 anode, with higher aluminium content, showed
a slightly higher global warming potential than the A5 anode. However, the A5 anode, with higher zinc content, showed a higher toxicity. This demonstrates the need for professional judgement when making decisions about sustainable materials selection. However, adopting the use of an LCC on engineering projects provides a clear, efficient and traceable methodology for informing those judgements. Moreover, while environmental scientists are essential in creating LCC tools and datasets, making these tools available to materials and corrosion engineers would promote the incorporation of sustainability objectives into day-to-day project decisions.

A Pan-Industrial View of Material Sustainability & Material Stewardship Practices

Panel Discussion

One of my favourite parts of the conference was the discussion that took place after the presentations on material sustainability and stewardship practices across multiple industries. One insight that stuck with me was the observation that corrosion engineers and climate scientists are often faced with the same challenge. Whether putting forward the case for investment in climate change action or corrosion control, our message is “act now so that nothing will happen”. If our recommendations are not followed and corrosion damage/climate chaos ensues, then we may be able to turn around and point out where we think things went wrong. However, if our recommendations are followed and nothing happens, then people may quite reasonably ask whether we really need to invest all that money and make significant changes to commonly accepted practices just to maintain the status quo. In my own day-to-day work, I am quite often one of a handful of materials and corrosion engineers on a project with around 50 structural engineers, geotechnical engineers, safety engineers and project managers. In that kind of environment, I’ve had to become multilingual, speaking the language of fundamental materials and corrosion science, broader engineering concepts, risk assessment and financial impact.

To that end, the ICorr Young Engineers Programme was a masterclass in effective communication. I would recommend that any early-career engineer participate in the programme if only for the experience of presenting your analysis of an engineering problem and your proposed solution as you would to a client, manager or research director.

Corrosion Engineers Just Do Nothing

I’d like to thank the Institute of Corrosion and my excellent mentor, Ali Morshed, for the opportunity to participate in the Young Engineers Programme and to attend the AMPP conference in Nashville. And, as the conference was in Music City, I’d like
to leave you with a quote Photo: YEP 2024 Winners celebrating in from one of my favourite Nashville for AMPP25. bands, the Talking Heads. If corrosion engineering is all about working hard to make sure that nothing happens, then “it’s hard to imagine that nothing at all could be so exciting.

References

1.Author(s), LCC Anodes Paper (placeholder), AMPP Annual Conference + Expo 2025, Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP), 2025.

2. A Gathorne-Hardy, Newcomer’s Guide to Life Cycle Assessment –Baselines and Boundaries, RGTW Working Paper No.

3, 2015. 3. ISO 9351:2025 – Galvanic Anodes for Cathodic Protection in Seawater and Saline Sediments, 1st edition, International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2025.

4. S Ebeling et al., “Investigation of Potential Metal Emissions from Galvanic Anodes in Offshore Wind Farms into North Sea Sediments”, Marine Pollution Bulletin, Vol. 194, 2023.

5. ANEMOI Project, Interreg North Sea Programme, available at:
https://www.interregnorthsea.eu/anemoi/ (accessed 5 June 2025).

ICorr President Visits The University of Manchester to Celebrate Scholarship Impact

ICorr President Visits The University of Manchester to Celebrate Scholarship Impact

On 1 May 2026, Institute of Corrosion President Dr Yunnan Gao visited The University of Manchester to review the continuing success of the ICorr Scholarship Programme and to meet students and staff involved in corrosion education and research.

The visit included meetings with Dr Beatriz Mingo and Professor Dirk Engelberg from the Department of Materials, during which the annual review of the ICorr-funded scholarship programme was presented. Since 2023, ICorr has committed £25,000 per year over a five-year period to support MSc and MEng students specialising in corrosion-related disciplines. The review highlighted the growing success of the initiative, with strong student engagement and increased application numbers across both programmes.

Dr Gao also met with Professor Scott Heath, Vice-Dean for Students, Teaching and Learning in the Faculty of Science and Engineering, and held discussions with ICorr Scholarship recipients Ayrton Spiller and Jana Al Shami. During a tour of the University campus, Dr Gao was also accompanied by ICorr Scholarship recipient Charles Foxall.

The University expressed its appreciation for ICorr’s continued support in helping to develop the next generation of corrosion professionals. In February 2026, scholarship recipients Ayrton Spiller and Jana Al Shami were formally recognised during the Faculty of Science and Engineering Scholarship Awards Ceremony, reflecting the growing visibility and impact of the partnership between ICorr and the University.

The visit concluded with recognition of ICorr’s contribution on The University of Manchester President’s Circles of Philanthropy, The Beyer Circle Board, where the Institute is proudly acknowledged for its support of student development and engineering education.

ICorr Scholarship Certificate Presented by Professor Scott Heath to Ayrton Spiller during the Faculty of Science and Engineering Scholarship Awards Ceremony in February 2026.

ICorr Scholarship Certificate Presented by Professor Scott Heath to Ayrton Spiller during the Faculty of Science and Engineering Scholarship Awards Ceremony in February 2026.

ICorr Scholarship Certificate Presented by Professor Scott Heath to Jana Al Shami during the Faculty of Science and Engineering Scholarship Awards Ceremony in February 2026.

ICorr President Dr Yunnan Gao Meeting with ICorr Scholarship Recipients Ayrton Spiller and Jana Al Shami in Manchester on 1 May 2026.

ICorr President Dr Yunnan Gao Touring The University of Manchester Campus Accompanied by ICorr Scholarship Recipient Charles Foxall on 1 May 2026.

The University of Manchester President’s Circles of Philanthropy, The Beyer Circle Board, Including the Name of the Institute of Corrosion.